International & Great Northern Railroad v. Pape
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Comal. Tried below before Hon. T. M. Paschal. This is a second appeal. In the report of the first appeal (62 Texas, :313) is a general statement of the case. This with the opinion here •will fully state the facts of the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Gaines, Associate Justice.—
This case was before this court on a-former appeal and is reported in 62 Texas, 313. T-he causes of action set forth in the original petition, which was filed the 31st of December, 1881, are shown by the report of the case in the volume cited. After the cause was remanded an amended petition was filed in December, 1885,. and another in December, 1886. Upon the latter the case was disposed, of upon the second trial. In the original petition damages were claimed, for the obstruction to plaintiff’s access to five acres of his land, which were alleged to have been cut…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gulf, Col. & S. F. R'y Co. v. HelsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. PapeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by79 opinions
- City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Engelman Irrigation District v. Shields Bros., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Foust v. Estate of Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Morgan v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.