Legal Opinion

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Department of Energy

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 9, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-90, 77-130, 77-131, 77-144, 77-155 and 77-407PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

Six oil companies 1 instituted these actions to challenge the Federal Energy Administration’s (“FEA”) belated interpretation of a regulatory scheme affecting prices from January 1, 1975 to February 1, 1976 (“the relevant period”). That interpretation required refiners .to allocate monthly sales revenues first to the recoupment of all increased “product costs’’ (primarily the costs of crude oil and purchased petroleum products) and then to the recoupment of increased “non-product costs” (most operating and marketing costs). See 41 Fed.Reg. 5111, 5113 (February 4,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. United States Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. Exxon Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  5. Cerro Metal Products v. MarshallDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API