Forgeus v. County of Santa Cruz
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land near Twin Lakes in Santa Cruz County, the bay of Mon terey being the southerly boundary line of said land. One of plaintiff’s predecessors in interest, J. C. Kimble, by deed dated September 4, 1890, granted to the county of Santa Cruz, for public use as a highway, street, or road, a strip of land sixty feet in width, now known as the East Clift Drive. It is the contention of appellant that the road divided the Kimble land into two parts, leaving north of the road high land and south of the road beach land. The tract south of the road is the one in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Teschemacher v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State of California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. HeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- City of Los Angeles v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Harrison County, Mississippi v. GuiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.