Liner v. DiCresce
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HIRAM H. WARD, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ separate Motions to Dismiss, for Protective Orders and a third parties’ Motion to Intervene. For the reasons stated herein, the various Motions to Dismiss will be partially granted and partially denied, the Motion to Intervene will be granted and the Motion for a Protective Order will be denied.
I. FACTS
Plaintiffs contend that they each own a business which purchased dairy products from or sold dairy products to the Pine State Creamery Company (hereinafter “Pine State”).…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Breeden v. Richmond Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Madison River Management Co. v. Business Management Software Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- TSC RESEARCH, LLC v. Bayer Chemicals Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Strates Shows, Inc. v. Amusements of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Dealers Supply Co., Inc. v. Cheil Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.