Legal Opinion

State v. Soto

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 13, 1988No. 1 CA-CR 11941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The principal issue in this case concerns whether the state failed to bring the defendant to trial in a timely fashion. We hold that delay attributable to the defendant when the case is pending in the city court is also attributable to him when the matter is transferred to the superior court for felony prosecution. Consequently, the defendant’s right to a speedy trial was not violated, and the trial court erred in dismissing the prosecution with prejudice.

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. Ignacio Soto was arrested four times in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinson v. CoulterArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. State v. BurrusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State v. DriggsArizona Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MendozaArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mathews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. State of Arizona v. Brian S. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. State v. MendozaArizona Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API