Legal Opinion
State v. Mendoza
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1992No. CR-90-0325-PRPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
Defendant Jorge G. Mendoza was convicted of (1) driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) with two prior DUI convictions and (2) driving with a blood-alcohol content (BAC) of 0.10 or more with two prior DUI convictions, both class 5 felonies, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 28-692 and -692.01. The trial court suspended Mendoza’s sentence, placed him on probation for three years, and imposed a mandatory 6-month prison term. The court of appeals reversed the convictions, 170 Ariz. 196, 823 P.2d 63, and we granted the state’s petition for review. We have…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.