State v. Hunter

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Brian Hunter was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of endangerment and one count of criminal damage. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent prison terms, the longer of which was three years. On appeal, Hunter contends he was denied his right to a speedy trial under Rule 8.2, Ariz. R.Crim. P. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdicts and resolve all reasonable inferences against Hunter. See State v. Martin, 225 Ariz. 162, ¶…