Legal Opinion

Mathews v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 26, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 89-0136PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.

On this appeal from the denial of relief in superior court on a special action brought from Tucson City Court, the sole issue is whether the speedy trial time limits of Rule 8, Ariz.R.Crim.Proc., 17 A.R.S., have been exceeded. Essentially, appellant’s position, relying on a dictum in Stone v. Wren, 22 Ariz.App. 165, 525 P.2d 296 (1974), is that any delay caused by him that did not result in an actual delay of the trial date is not excluded time under Rule 8.4(a). We reject this argument. Every defense delay is to be excluded. If the rule were otherwise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. BurrusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. Stone v. WrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API