Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporate
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
This case of first impression calls upon us to interpret and apply the Texas Optometry Act. Wal-Mart rented space to optometrists using a standard lease agreement requiring optometrists to make representations in their leases of the projected number of hours their offices would remain open. A jury found Wal-Mart liable for “setting or attempting to influence ... office hours of an optometrist” in violation of the Act. The jury returned a civil penalty award, which the district judge called “stunning” and “the highest verdict that’s been reached in this court ...…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Combs v. Health Care Services Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
- Arismendez v. Nightingale Home Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Carleen Black v. Pan American LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ForteTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016