Legal Opinion

Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporate

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 14, 2014No. 12-40854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

This case of first impression calls upon us to interpret and apply the Texas Optometry Act. Wal-Mart rented space to optometrists using a standard lease agreement requiring optometrists to make representations in their leases of the projected number of hours their offices would remain open. A jury found Wal-Mart liable for “setting or attempting to influence ... office hours of an optometrist” in violation of the Act. The jury returned a civil penalty award, which the district judge called “stunning” and “the highest verdict that’s been reached in this court ...…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Combs v. Health Care Services Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Arismendez v. Nightingale Home Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Carleen Black v. Pan American LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ForteTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API