Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Forte
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hecht
in which JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE JOHNSON, JUSTICE GUZMAN, and. JUSTICE BROWN joined.
The State of Texas as amicus curiae argues that the certified questions now before us from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit are premised on an incorrect understanding of Texas law. Our dilemma is whether to address the premise of the questions when the parties have not done so, or answer questions that are hypothetical if the State is right. We choose the latter course.
The Texas Optometry Act1 prohibits commercial retailers of ophthalmic goods from attempting to control the practice of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. De La CruzTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In re Nalle Plastics Family Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. MendezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Geters v. Eagle Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Agey v. American Liberty Pipe Line CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- in Re Xerox Corporation and Xerox State Healthcare, LLC F/K/A Acs State Healthcare, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Harris County Appraisal District v. Texas Workforce CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Bear Ranch, L.L.C. v. Heartbrand Beef, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- in Re Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2017
- Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.