Legal Opinion

Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporate

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 27, 2016No. 12-40854Published

1Per curiam

The Texas Supreme Court has resolved the certified questions in this case. In the light of - its answers, we now vacate the district court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Plaintiffs, a group of optometrists who leased office space from Wal-Mart. Stores, Inc., in its retail stores," sued Wal-Mart for violations of the Texas Optometry Act, Tex. Occ. Code §§ 351.001-.608. They alleged that Wal-Mart, in violation of the Act, attempted to control their practice of optometry by exercising influence over their hours. Plaintiffs conceded that they did not suffer any compensatory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ForteTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Doris Forte v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API