Legal Opinion

Mata v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1993No. 20348PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Ray L. Mata appeals the order of the district court summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Mata contends that the district court erred in dismissing his application without an evi-dentiary hearing on the issues of ineffective assistance of counsel, breach of the plea agreement and involuntariness of his guilty plea. Because we conclude that an evidentiary hearing must be afforded with respect to one of the issues raised, we affirm in part, vacate in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. BACKGROUND

Mata and his wife,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sheahan v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Ricca v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Berg v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Beasley v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. HanslovanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API