Legal Opinion

Green Mountain Energy Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) asks us to quash an appeal from its Order permitting PECO Energy Company’s (PECO) wind tariff to become effective before resolving anti-competition complaints. We conclude that the PUC’s Order, which was entered without prejudice to outstanding complaints, was neither a final, appealable order nor an appealable collateral order. Accordingly, we quash the appeal as premature, thereby allowing the PUC to complete its investigation and hearing process.

The background for this litigation is the Electricity Generation Customer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'n v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Smitley v. Holiday Rambler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority v. GladstoneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. T.J. McCloskey, Acting Consumer Advocate v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API