Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority v. Gladstone

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 2010No. 382 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge LEADBETTER.

Appellants, Richard W. Gladstone, 1 II and Diana L. Hunkele, proceeding pro se, appeal from the order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas (common pleas) granting a new trial. This matter arises from a statutory appeal filed by Appellants from a determination of the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority (Authority) following a hearing held before that agency’s Water Exoneration Hearing Board (Board).

Appellants and one other individual reside at 5807 Walnut Street, Pittsburgh, PA (the Residence). On May 29, 2007, the Authority sent an invoice to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Colville v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. In Re Estate of StrickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. School District v. Hamot Medical CenterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Sparacino v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re: Sheriff's Excess Proceeds Lit. Appeal of: J. O'Hara and Finn Land Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Lobos Management v. Powell, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. E. Dardanell v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. J. J. and P. J. Miravich v. Twp. of Exeter and Metrodev V, LPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. J.T. Bollinger v. SD of Cheltenham Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API