Legal Opinion

The Zumbrun Law Firm v. California Legislature

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 2008No. C054832PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff, The Zumbrun Law Firm, brought this action as a taxpayer against defendants California Legislature, its Committees on Rules and others, 1 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that a contract for the Capitol Park Safety and Security Improvements Project (Capitol Project), entered into by the Committees on Rules of the Legislature to improve security measures at the Capitol by controlling access to the State Capitol building and grounds, violated the separation of powers doctrine of the state Constitution 2 and unlawfully restricted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Tobacco Cases ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Bullis Charter School v. Los Altos School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Gateway Community Charters v. SpiessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Freedom Foundation v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API