Legal Opinion

Rho Company v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1989No. 55569-9Published

1DissentDore, J.

(dissenting)—I dissent.

No one should mistake the fact that the majority has inflicted a catastrophic loss of revenue on the State. The wider implications of this decision should be recognized, if only as a measure of how wrong the decision is. First, although it directly concerns only the business and occupation (B&O) tax, this case necessarily will have an enormous impact on the calculation of the state sales tax. Since the B&O and retail sales tax statutes share a number of key definitions, many sales of services fall under the category of "retail sales" for B&O and sales tax purposes. By…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lonsdale v. ChesterfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Co. v. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Walthew v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Christensen, O'Connor, Garrison & Havelka v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gay v. Lavina State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API