Christensen, O'Connor, Garrison & Havelka v. Department of Revenue
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*765Dore, J.
Plaintiff patent attorneys seek reversal of the trial court's summary judgment in favor of the Department of Revenue. Such summary judgment of dismissal, in essence, provided that plaintiff could not exclude from its gross income, for business and occupation tax purposes, amounts it received as reimbursements from its clients to pay the fees of foreign, non-Washington and Washington, D.C., lawyers, the fees of independent professional draftsmen and fees related to obtaining and maintaining patents in foreign countries.
The taxpayer is a law firm with its sole office in Seattle,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John H. Sellen Construction Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Coachman, Inc. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Sansom Reporting, Inc. v. Feiner, Klaris & CurtisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1971
3Cited by28 opinions
- McCARTHY v. RECORDEX SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Washington Imaging Services, LLC v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Imaging Services v. State Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Walthew v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Rho Company v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.