Legal Opinion

Walthew v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1984No. 50105-0PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This case was heard on direct appeal under RAP 4.2. The Department of Revenue appeals the trial court's decision that the Walthew firm (taxpayer) is not required to pay the state business and occupation tax on client reimbursements for payments made by the taxpayer to court reporters, physicians, and process servers. The issue before the court is one of statutory interpretation. Does the definition of gross income under RCW 82.04.080 include client reimbursements to lawyers on advances made to third party providers, when the lawyer is acting as agent *185for the client, and the client remains…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nucleonics Alliance v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Christensen, O'Connor, Garrison & Havelka v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. National Can Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Washington Imaging Services, LLC v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Imaging Services v. State Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Rho Company v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API