Legal Opinion
Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 2, 2003No. 02-299PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates the sale of electricity at wholesale in interstate commerce. 16 U. S. C. § 824(b). In this capacity, FERC must ensure that wholesale rates are “just and reasonable,” § 824d(a). In Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg, 476 U. S. 953 (1986), and Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Moore, 487 U. S. 354 (1988) (MP&L), the Court concluded that, under the filed rate doctrine, FERC-approved cost allocations between affiliated energy compa nies may not be subjected to reevaluation in state rate-making proceedings. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Pittman v. MISSISSIPPI PSCMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. EnCana Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- California ex rel. Lockyer v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Public Utility District No. 1 Of Grays Harbor County Washington v. Idacorp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.