Legal Opinion
E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. EnCana Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2007No. 05-17352PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”) alleged that EnCana Corp., a natural gas supplier, and WD Energy Services, Inc., a wholly-owned marketing subsidiary of EnCana Corp. (collectively “EnCana”), along with multiple unnamed coconspirators, inflated the price Gallo paid for natural gas through their violations of state and federal antitrust laws. EnCana sought summary judgment on the ground that the filed rate doctrine and federal preemption bar Gallo’s claims as a matter of law. The district court denied EnCana’s summary judgment motion. We have jurisdiction over this…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Learjet, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Satey v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Rio Grande Royalty Co. v. Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.