Hedges v. Carrigan
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
*580Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, Stephen E. Carrigan, individually and doing business as National Real Estate Council, appeals from an order denying his petition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.21 to compel plaintiffs, Arthur W. Hedges and Dimity Hedges, to arbitrate a dispute. The dispute arose from plaintiffs’ purchase of a single family residence from the sellers and defendants, Lane G. Weinman and Cynthia N. Weinman. In the published portion, we discuss whether section 1298 is subject to the limited preemptive effect of the United States Arbitration Act. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Westra v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Ovitz v. SchulmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Shepard v. Edward MacKay Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Woolls v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.