Legal Opinion

Reid v. Harbison Development Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 1986No. 22573PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

The plaintiffs-respondents, Rossie N. Reid and Paul W. Reid, brought this action against the defendants-respondents, Harbison Development Corporation (now Petitioner) and Sam D. Coogler, Builder, Inc., alleging fraud and deceit growing out of a contract whereby the Reids were to *321buy realty. Sam D. Coogler, Builder, Inc., is in bankruptcy and is no longer a party to this proceeding.

At trial, the jury found in favor of the Reids actual damages in the amount of twenty thousand ($20,000.00) dollars, plus punitive damages in the amount of twenty-thousand ($20,000.00) dollars.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroway v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Industrial Welding Supplies, Inc. v. Atlas Vending Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Reid v. Harbison Development CorporationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Allen v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. May v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Aiken County v. BSP Division of Envirotech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. Solley v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API