Legal Opinion
Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority v. Adamkus
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 17, 1987No. 86-CV-72910-DTPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES
HACKETT, District Judge.
This case is presently before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for costs and attorney fees. For the reasons stated below, the motion of the Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority and that of Combustion Engineering, Inc. is granted.
BACKGROUND
The lawsuit underlying this application for costs and attorney fees was brought by plaintiffs Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority (GDRRA) and Combustion Engineering, Inc. (C-E). Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority is a public body…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Estate of Woll ex rel. Woll v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Solar Turbines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority and Combustion Engineering v. The United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.