Legal Opinion · Dissent

Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority and Combustion Engineering v. The United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1990No. 88-2269Published

1DissentKrupansky, Circuit Judge

By a stroke of legal legerdemain, the panel majority has divested the district court of its jurisdiction over an original action for declaratory and injunctive relief by conjuring the illusion that an equivocal, advisory letter from the Environmental Protection Agency constituted a final agency order reviewable only in this court pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1) (section 307(b)(1)). Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

The majority’s opinion correctly notes that judicial review of all final actions of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API