Legal Opinion

Socha v. Metz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 8, 1955No. 8879Published

1Opinion of the Court

CRUMLISH, J.,

The above matter is before us on a petition for rule to show cause why the writ of mandamus execution issued by plaintiff and against the City of Philadelphia, additional defendant, should not be quashed and execution against it upon said judgment should not be stayed, and also to show cause why judgment against it should not be: (a) Satisfied of record because of plaintiff’s failure to file a petition for an award by the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Board within one year from date of the alleged accident, or (b) should not be paid according to schedule set forth in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Swartz v. ConradisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Parker v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. McIntyre v. STRAUSSERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API