Legal Opinion

Mote v. Hilyard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1961No. 38955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This is an action for damages for bodily injuries allegedly resulting from a motor vehicle collision, in which defendant cross-petitioned for his alleged injuries. At the close of all the evidence, the trial court sustained plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s evidence as to defendant’s cross-petition and submitted plaintiff’s case to the jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff.

Defendant appeals, assigning as the sole error the action of the trial court in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer and removing defendant’s cross-petition from consideration by the jury.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Sturdevant v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dirickson v. MingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Condo v. BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Thur v. DunkleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Evans v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. England v. KilcreaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API