Legal Opinion
Condo v. Beal
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 31, 1967No. 40894PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from judgment for plaintiff and order overruling defendants’ motion for new trial in an action for damages brought by plaintiff, Bertha Beal, against defendants, Eula Condo, D. R. Condo and Daniel Condo. In two causes of action, plaintiff sued for damages for loss of earning capacity, physical and mental suffering, medical expenses and property damages in the total amount of $62,326.40. Judgment was for plaintiff in the amount of $2840.31.
Three vehicles were involved in the accident which led to this damage suit. Eula Condo was driving west on Highway…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Holdenville v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Mote v. HilyardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Ellis v. RaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Andrews Ex Rel. Andrews v. AdaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Lambert v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Langdon v. Saga Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Fleming v. Baptist General ConventionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.