Legal Opinion

Thur v. Dunkley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 8, 1970No. 42343PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

The parties to this appeal will be referred to herein by their trial court designation. The plaintiff, Joseph Dunkley, instituted this action against the defendants, Albert B. Thur, Douglas Reed Sharp, Galen J. May and Cubie Elroy Loveless, for property damage resulting from an accident to his tractor-trailer, allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendants.

The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against only the defendants Thur and Sharp in the amount of $4,698.59.

This appeal has been perfected by the defendant Thur on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norman v. Scrivner-Stevens Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Beesley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Transport Indemnity Company v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Cheatham v. Van DalsemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Breno v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. LoosenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Blanke v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Jackson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Atherton v. DevineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Iglehart v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API