Legal Opinion

Tires Unlimited v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1986No. H001555PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AGLIANO, P. J.

Tires Unlimited, a partnership, and Tires Unlimited, a partnership doing business as Tires Unlimited, defendants in the underlying civil action (named as two separate entities), seek a writ of mandate to compel the Santa Clara County Superior Court to vacate its order denying their motion to dismiss for untimely return of summons and to enter a new order granting the motion. Elena Galvez and Derek Quiroz, the real parties in interest and the plaintiffs in the suit, failed to return the summons within three years after filing their lawsuit, but did return it within 60 days…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cranston v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brookview Condominium Owners' Ass'n v. Heltzer Enterprises-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Chambers v. Santa Cruz City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Biss v. BohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Brookview Condominium Owners' Ass'n v. Heltzer Enterprises-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Brookview Condominium v. Heltzer Enter.-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API