Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brookview Condominium Owners' Ass'n v. Heltzer Enterprises-Brookview

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1990No. G004539Published

1ConcurrenceWallin, Acting P. J.

I concur in the result only.

Plaintiff Brookview Condominium Owners’ Association did not serve the summons and complaint on defendant and respondent Heltzer EnterprisesBrookview (Enterprises) within three-years after filing suit. In this court Brookview contends Enterprises made a general appearance before its motion to dismiss and therefore cannot assert the bar of the three-year statute. As the lead opinion states, a general appearance after an untimely service does not affect a defendant’s right to dismissal. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 333 [216 Cal.Rptr. 718, 703 P.2d 58];…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Busching v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Dale v. ITT Life Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Tires Unlimited v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API