Legal Opinion
In Re Marlow
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 26, 1995No. 93-BG-104PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Senior Judge:
This disciplinary matter is before this court on the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) that reciprocal discipline be imposed on respondent. Bar Counsel supports the recommendation. We agree that the imposition of reciprocal discipline is appropriate.
On December 8, 1992, the Maryland Court of Appeals sanctioned respondent with a thirty-day suspension, based on its finding that he violated Rule 1.15 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Marlow, Misc.Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 16 (MD Dec. 8,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re GentileDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997