Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1996No. 96-180PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

Harold Sorenson brought this action to recover damages from his purchase of a defective Massey-Ferguson combine. The District Court for the Sixteenth Judicial District, Rosebud County, granted the motion of Massey-Ferguson, Inc., to dismiss Sorenson’s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), M.R.Civ.R We affirm.

The sole issue Sorenson raises on appeal is whether the doctrine of equitable tolling should have been invoked to toll the statutes of limitation on his claims. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., filed a cross-appeal in which it argues that this appeal was taken without substantial or reasonable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. ChanceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Nicholson v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hash v. U.S. West Communications ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Chance v. HarrisonMontana Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Blue Mountain Women's ClinicMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Wolf's Interstate Leasing & Sales, L.L.C. v. BanksMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Little Big Warm Ranch, LLC v. DollMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Braulick v. Hathaway Meats, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hilten v. BraggMontana Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API