Hilten v. Bragg
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Plaintiffs Robert and Lynn Hilten (Hiltens) appeal the order entered by the District Court for the Twenty-Second Judicial District, Stillwater County, granting in part Defendant Roy Bragg’s (Bragg) motion for sanctions. We affirm. We restate the issue on appeal as follows:
¶2 Did the District Court err in ordering sanctions against plaintiffs, holding them jointly and severally liable for defendant’s attorney fees and costs?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶3 The facts tell a rather incredible tale of adult misbehavior. Hiltens and Bragg live in the Eagle Mountain subdivision near Columbus,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- D'AGOSTINO v. SwansonMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Byrum v. AndrenMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Textana, Inc. v. Klabzuba Oil & GasMontana Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fick v. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Runkle v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 2016