Legal Opinion

Hilten v. Bragg

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2010No. DA 09-0340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Plaintiffs Robert and Lynn Hilten (Hiltens) appeal the order entered by the District Court for the Twenty-Second Judicial District, Stillwater County, granting in part Defendant Roy Bragg’s (Bragg) motion for sanctions. We affirm. We restate the issue on appeal as follows:

¶2 Did the District Court err in ordering sanctions against plaintiffs, holding them jointly and severally liable for defendant’s attorney fees and costs?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 The facts tell a rather incredible tale of adult misbehavior. Hiltens and Bragg live in the Eagle Mountain subdivision near Columbus,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. D'AGOSTINO v. SwansonMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Byrum v. AndrenMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Textana, Inc. v. Klabzuba Oil & GasMontana Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fick v. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Runkle v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API