Legal Opinion
Chance v. Harrison
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1995No. 95-024PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage
James Edward Chance, III (Chance), appeals the decision of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, denying his motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
The sole issue on review is whether the District Court erred in denying Chance’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the statute of limitations was equitably tolled.
Carol Thomas Harrison (Harrison) went to work for Chance in September 1986. Harrison groomed and trained Chance’s horses and maintained and cleaned his bam. Harrison terminated her employment with Chance on March 17, 1987, following several alleged incidents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Harrison v. ChanceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Erickson v. CroftMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Hash v. U.S. West Communications ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Drinkwalter v. Shipton Supply Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mary Jane WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas David MARCHINGTON; Inland Empire Shows, Inc., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Davis v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Montana v. GilhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Sorenson v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 298, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 407 State of Montana v. Toni A. Gilham, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christine Marie GilhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.