Legal Opinion

Texas Department of Insurance v. American National Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2012No. 10-0374PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina

The issue in this appeal is whether stop-loss insurance sold to self-funded employee health-benefit plans is “direct health insurance” or “reinsurance.” The distinction is significant because direct insurance is subject to state insurance regulation, while reinsurance is not. Reinsurance is not regulated because it typically involves the reallocation of risk between two insurance companies rather than a consumer-insurance transaction. The parties to this appeal disagree about whether an employer who self funds a health-benefit plan for its employees is an “insurer” under the Texas Insurance…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Osterberg v. PecaTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. in Re the Office of the Attorney GeneralTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Combs v. Roark Amusement & Vending, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Southwest Royalties, Inc. v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Health Care Service Corp. v. Methodist Hospitals oCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. HegarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API