Legal Opinion
Osterberg v. Peca
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 2000No. 97-1027PublishedCited by 634 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Abbott
in which Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, Justice BAKER and Justice GONZALES join, and a plurality opinion with respect to part V, in which Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, Justice BAKER join.
We overrule the Osterbergs’ motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion dated July 29, 1999, and substitute the following.
In this case we conclude that a candidate who seeks to enforce Texas Election Code reporting requirements is not required to prove that persons making unreported expenditures against the candidate knew they were breaking the law. Arriving at that conclusion requires us to decide the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by634 opinions
- St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Romero v. KPH Consolidation, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
629 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.