Legal Opinion

Winstead v. Williams, Mayor

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 26, 1925No. 11774PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is a petition for injunction to prohibit the Town of Mullins from the issuance of bonds voted. The case involves but a single issue:

“Can a city or town issue bonds, exclusive of water, sewer, and light bonds, to the full amount of 8 per centum of the assessed value of property therein, regardless of the bonded debt of other political subdivisions covering in whole or in part the said city or town?”

This Court has laid down the following principle in Elliott et al. v. Heyward et al., 121 S. E., 257:

“The county is a unit, and is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bagnall v. Clarendon & Orangeburg Bridge Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Elliott v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Banks v. School District No. 18Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Berry v. MillikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  3. House v. School Dist. No. 4Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Marshall v. Rose, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Berry v. MillikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API