Elliott v. Heyward
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.
This is in the original jurisdiction, and is a petition for injunction, on a rule issued by the Chief Justice.
The facts are undisputed. The sole question is whether the proposed issue of bonds by Fairfield County violates Article 10, Section 5, of the Constitution of 1895. We are of the opinion that it does not. It was never contemplated, and is not a fair construction of this section to say, that a county cannot issue and sell bonds up to 8 per cent, of the total assessed value of all the property in the county.
The county is a unit,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Berry v. MillikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Banks v. School District No. 18Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Winstead v. Williams, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Stackhouse v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.