Legal Opinion

Bagnall v. Clarendon & Orangeburg Bridge Dist.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 26, 1925No. 11697PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Acting Associate Justice W. C. Cothran.

This proceeding for injunction was brought in the original jurisdiction of this Court and seeks to enjoin the Clarendon and Orangeburg bridge district and its board of commissioners from issuing bonds in the sum of $180,000 for the purpose of building a connecting bridge between the two' counties over the Santee River. A rule to show cause was issued by Associate Justice Marion and return to the rule was duly made by the respondents on February 14, 1925. The petition alleges that the issue of bonds is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murph v. LandrumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Nettles v. CantwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Town of Palm Beach v. City of West Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  5. Gould v. BartonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API