Marshall v. Rose, Mayor
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The order of Judge Sease follows:
The plaintiff in this action is a taxpayer of the City of Marion. Fie seeks to enjoin the corporate authorities of that City from issuing not exceeding Fifty Thousand ($50,000-.00) Dollars of General Obligation Bonds of the City, whose proceeds are to be used “for the erection of a recreation center and swimming pool within the city limits of Marion.” To a complaint which alleges the invalidity of such bonds upon the grounds,(a) That the purpose for which their proceeds are to be expended is neither a corporate purpose, Article VIII, Section 6, nor a public…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Luther v. WheelerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Gentry v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Winstead v. Williams, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Hospitality Ass'n of South Carolina, Inc. v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Mims v. McNairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Leonard v. TALBERTSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Sadler v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.