Legal Opinion

Kaneko v. Okuda

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1961No. Civ. 24658PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Cross-appeals from a judgment of specific performance of a contract for the sale of corporate stock.

The judgment orders the transfer of 250 shares of common stock of Holiday Bowl, Inc., to plaintiff, 75 shares by each of the defendants Hanko Okuda, Paul TJyemura, and Harry Oshiro, and 25 shares by defendant Harley Kusumoto. Holiday Bowl, Inc., is a party defendant. Defendants appeal from the judgment and plaintiff appeals from that part of the judgment which denies specific performance against Harley Kusumoto for an additional 50 shares.

The individual defendants formed a corporation…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
  5. Estate of AdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Stewart Lamle v. Mattel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. National Motor Club of Missouri, Inc. v. NoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Parrish v. Terre Haute Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Stanchfield v. Hamer Toyota, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API