Rosarita Mexican Foods v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 We must decide in this special action whether the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred by continuing benefits to claimant Francisco Tapia and awarding him further diagnostic testing without proof that his condition was medically non-stationary. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the ALJ did not err in awarding diagnostic testing but incorrectly continued other benefits to Tapia. We therefore set aside the award.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Tapia, a cook employed by Rosarita Mexican Foods, injured his back at work while lifting boxes of vegetables in June,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. Super. Ct., Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aguayo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management v. Scott WoodworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Coman v. wilson/archCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.