Legal Opinion
Washington v. Thurgood Marshall Academy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 2005No. 03-2570 (CKK/JMF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me for discovery. Currently for resolution is Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration and/or in the Alternative a Motion to Alter and/or Amend the Magistrate’s July 20, 2005 Order (“Pl.’s Mot. for Recons.”) striking Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant Thurgood Marshall Academy to Answer Interrogatories and Produce Documents and for Sanctions (“Pl.’s Mot. to Compel”). For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs motion for reconsideration will be granted and plaintiffs previously stricken motion to compel, after…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Washington v. Thurgood Marshall AcademyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Muwekma Tribe v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Waters v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Doe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. O'KeefeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Meijer, Inc. V. Warner Chilcott Holdings Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Colón v. BladesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Kline v. SpringerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.