Legal Opinion
Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol Police
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 7, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0893Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JODI BREITERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-0893 (TJK/RMM) ) UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Movant Capitol Police Board’s (“Movant” or “CPB”) Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order (“Motion to Quash”) [ECF No. 25], which seeks to quash two subpoenas served by Plaintiff Jodi Breiterman (“Plaintiff” or “Ms. Breiterman”) on non- parties Fay Ropella, Inspector General of the United States Capitol Police (“USCP”), and the USCP Office of Inspector General…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.