Legal Opinion
Burkett v. JA Thompson & Son
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1957No. Civ. 22188PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Appeal from a judgment for $5,450 damages resulting from an allegedly fraudulent sale of real property. A reversal is demanded on the ground that the evidence does not sustain a finding that defendant Wicker, through his agent, represented to his successor in interest that the house was built on original soil.
Lot 14 was on the side of a hill and was owned by Marlow Burns Land Company in May, 1946. The company employed J. A. Thompson and Son to fill the lot and grade it for the purpose of subdivision and sale. The grading and filling were finished the same month and Mr. Thompson filed his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Reed v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Snelson v. Ondulando Highlands Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Massei v. LettunichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Crawford v. NastosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.