Legal Opinion
Massei v. Lettunich
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1967No. Civ. 23060PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (H. C.), J.
Appellants are adjoining homeowners of residential property in Watsonville who consolidated their actions to recover damages sustained to their property as a result of landslides and subsidence of their land. Bespondents are Peter Lettunich, the landowner, and the Malatestas, Andrew and Louis, who did the actual filling and grading work under Lettunich’s direction.
The actions were tried on two theories of liability: (1) negligence on the part of all the respondents, and (2) deceit on the part of respondent Lettunich. At the close of appellants’ case the trial court granted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Clauser v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Reuther v. ViallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines) v. Walter Kidde & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Lovejoy v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.