Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hopkins v. Raub

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1920No. 22,669PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This is a mandamus proceeding brought by the state to compel the county clerk to join in the execution of bonds authorized by a vote of the electors of Shawnee county, to pay for the permanent improvement of a highway. *198The defendant questions the validity of the act under which the bonds were authorized, and he also alleges that no provision has been made for the payment of the bonds which would accrue in 1920, and further that it is proposed to issue bonds in excess of the expenditure already made towards the improvement. It appears…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hines v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  2. Comm'rs of Ottawa Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Stevenson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Midland Elevator Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Spencer v. Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. State ex rel. Griffith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Barrett v. City of OsawatomieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Giddings v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. State ex rel. Griffith v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API