Legal Opinion

Giddings v. City of Pittsburg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1966No. 44,591PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This appeal is from a judgment enjoining the City of Pittsburg, Kansas, from proceeding with certain street improvements.

The essential facts are not seriously disputed. Catalpa Street runs north and south in Pittsburg and, for the present, is surfaced with asphalt. On October 28, 1963, a petition was filed with the city clerk of Pittsburg requesting that Catalpa Street, from Quincy to Maple Streets, be improved with concrete pavement, including curb, storm sewer, inlets and all appurtenances. This petition designated the area which the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. FadelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Hopkins v. RaubSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Hill v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Engstrom v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Newson v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Davis v. City of LeawoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Davies v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Board of Education of Unified School District No. 345 v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API