Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spencer v. Drainage District No. 1

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1927No. 27,385PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a quo warranto proceeding, which questions the corporate existence of drainage district No. 1 of Lyon county. The drainage district was organized, and is attempting to function under R. S. 24-601 to 24-640. The trial court held R. S. 24-601 to be void for the reason that it confers upon the petitioners legislative powers, and held R. S. 24-603 to be void for the reason that it confers legislative powers upon the district court. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed. The sole question before us is the validity,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. City of Hutchinson v. LeimbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Callen v. City of Junction CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. Ruland v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITYSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. Jordan v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Tomasic v. Kansas City, Kansas Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Water District No. 1 v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API