Legal Opinion
Center v. Arp
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 22, 1944No. 15025PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Presiding Justice.
While, under the uniform practice act of 1887 (Code, § 37-901), the joining against the same defendants of legal and equitable rights and remedies which are connected with or dependent upon each other does not render the petition subject to the. objection of duplicity or multifario.usness (Hawkins v. Georgia & Alabama Railway, 108 Ga. 784, 33 S. E. 682; Grimmett v. Barnwell, 184 Ga. 461, 463, 192 S. E. 191, 116 A. L. R. 257), still a legal petition in quo warranto against named defendants as the incumbent mayor and councilmen is subject to the objection, made by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Grimmett v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Arnett v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- McCarthy v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morris v. PetersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Smith v. UpshawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- State ex rel. Nixon v. BeltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bowling v. DoyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Gregory W. Edwards v. Jackie SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023